Tuesday, April 19, 2016

Tech Musing 3: Thoughts on Edward Snowden and Security news



Edward Snowden is an American computer professional, former Central Intelligence Agency employee. He leaked and disclosure information about the American government monitors the citizens and foreign people. He also disclosures American government monitors a telecommunication company in China as well. They can access the phone records and crack passwords. His words involve many organizations and governments. When he disclosure the top-secret information about the NSA and CIA’s activities, he was working as a contractor at NSA.

According to the “A Conversation on Privacy”, Edward Snowed mentioned that privacy is the right of every individual. As he said, people become more protected and concerned about their privacy recently. The Internet is neutral, it was designed to communicate with each other, and it can be quickly accessed, which is free open to everyone. However, there should be a balance between individuals’ privacy and government issues, and what they can access should ensure the safety and security of citizens. Although America is an open society, most documents can be accessed and searched, the American government still monitors their citizens’ privacy. If the government can use those data to prevent a terrorist attack, there won’t be incidents like in Paris.

According to the article “The NSA denied Hillary a secure BlackBerry”, we can see that the FBI didn’t admit they possess the necessary decryption keys about the wiretap of users’ communications. We know that FBI wants Apple to decryption an iPhone 5C, but in order to protect customers’ privacy, Apple refuse to do that. It confirms that a report said that the FBI pushed tech companies to reveal source code. The ZDNet reports that the US government requested the tech firms to hand over the proprietary source code.

In this article, it said that the Secretary of State Hillary Clinton asked in 2009 to get her blackberry cellphone more secure, which can be difficult for hackers to turn it into a remote spying device. But NSA denied her request. And they thought Clinton knew her blackberry was not secure at all, but she still used that for sensitive emails. There is no evidence that she carried her insecure blackberry into sensitive meetings.

In the Edward Snowed’s case, part of people said he is a hero. Based on his revelation, they begin protecting their privacy more careful. Others think Snowed against his work and break the law. He shouldn’t reveal the related top-secret information to everyone in the world, it is their work and duty to monitor their citizens. As far as I can see, there should be a balance between individual’s privacy and laws. The government should give individuals’ a safe place to ensure their security, on the other side, citizens still need to protect their privacy. For the Apple/Blackberry and FBI case, I don’t think FBI has any mistakes to ask Apple to unlock a terrorist’s phone, but pushed tech companies to reveal the proprietary source code against tech companies’ rights, and they won’t be able to comply FBI’s demand in some ways.



http://www.wired.com/2016/03/security-news-week-nsa-denied-hillary-secure-blackberry/

1 comment:

  1. Just to clarify, Snowden didn't reveal this information to everyone; he gave it to journalists to decide what to reveal. Just like the Panama Papers, journalists are left to decide what to reveal and how to write it so others understand the extent of the bad, illegal deeds. Snowden only broke the law because other whistleblowers never got the message out and their rights were trampled upon by those who controlled the rhetoric, no matter how much they lied about it.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.